The School for Scandal Essay Example for Free

The School for Scandal Essay The dialogue in this play is everything. I dont believe that if this play were written without the Shakespearean style it would hold its meaning or its comedic qualities together. The dialogue is very fast paced and sometimes hard to understand, but that is what makes it so entertaining. The plot really doesnt become clear until the 3rd act of this play. We are finally informed on pg. 477 of what the point of this play is. Sir Oliver says before I form my judgment of either of them, I intend to make a trial of their hearts-and my friend Rowley and I have planned something for the purpose. later on the same page they explain this plan for testing the two brothers. Through exposition we learn more of what is to happen to these brothers as Sir Peter comes up with another idea on how to test them on pg. 478 Now then, Sir Oliver, you may have a better opportunity of satisfying yourself than by an old romancing tale of a poor relation;- go with my friend Moses, and represent Mr. Premium, and then Ill answer for t, you will see your nephew in all his glory. Sir Peter thinks that this plan will surely show Sir Oliver how bad of a person his nephew Charles really is. The idea of this play obviously revolves around gossip. Every character in this play is attacked by this gossip at some point. No one is immune. Mrs. Candour says it several times in different ways that in fact everyone gossips and everyone is gossiped about and there is no way to stop it. She says on pg. 469 from several different places in the conversation.. but there is no stopping peoples tongues. Whats to be done? People will talk-theres no preventing it. But the world is so censorious, no character escapes. I think that she knows its wrong and says many times that tale-bearers are as bad as tale-makers but then she goes and starts telling another story about someone. Her constant contradiction of herself is absolutely hilarious. A surprising character in this play is Lady Teazle. Although it plainly says that she is from the country and from this we would assume that she is not well educated, she doesnt sound uneducated from the dialogue. I really liked her character, she is so strong willed and bullheaded. This forceful attitude is the only thing in the dialogue that suggests that she is from a lesser social circle. This is shown on pg. 472 when she says Sir Peter, Sir Peter, you may it or not, as you please; but I out to have my own way in everything, and whats more, I will too. What! though I was educated in the country, I know very well that women of fashion in London are accountable to nobody after they are married. Unfortunately for her, her husband, Sir Peter, does not agree with this philosophy. But he does love her and she knows it, that why she also knows that she can get away with anything she wants with him. I think she really did marry the old man just for his money, but in the end she realizes that she loves him too. I think Sir Peter on the other hand lets her get away with these things out of sheet boredom and the need to have something to talk, or gripe about. On pg 471 he says to Rowley But the fault is entirely hers, Master Rowley. I am, myself, the sweetest-tempered mad alive and hate a teasing temper- and so I tell her a hundred times a day This is funny because on the very next page he is the one who goads Lady Teazle into an argument. The dialogue in this play holds so much of the play together. There is almost no action, other than entrances and exits so the scenes have to pushed by the dialogue so that it doesnt drag. I think this is the main reason behind the fast paced conversations, that and humor.

The Death Penalty is Cruel and Unusual Punishment Essay -- essays rese

We kill people to show them killing is wrong. The death penalty does not punish people for killing but for murdering someone. Murder is "the unlawful, malicious, or permitted killing of one human being by another" (Carmical 1). The slogan should be ?We execute people to show people that murder is wrong.? The death penalty is racist, it punishes the poor, it causes the innocent to die, it is not a deterrent against violent crime, and it is cruel and unusual punishment. The death penalty is wrong and it should be abolished. The death penalty ?cruel and unusual punishment.? At one time in history around six hundred people were executed, and in those six-hundred eighty of them were innocent but still executed (Thomas 2). Many people say that the death penalty is lawful. They think that if the punishment is carried out by the government and not by one person it is fine, and it is not cruel and unusual punishment (Carmical 2). Yes, the men who constructed the constitution supported the death penalty, but times have changed and so has the constitution. The constitution should abolish the death penalty (Carmical 5). Many states in America have already abolished the death penalty, including Michigan. If the U.S wants to abolish the death penalty all together we would just need to take it step by step and then it would be easy. It would be easy because studies show that 68% of the sentences actually don?t happen! We only need to worry about the other 32 % (Dieter Speech 5). And 82% of the Cases end up in life sentences in jail. The goal is to end all cases, for murdering someone, to life sentences. A couple amendments have to do with the death penalty. These two would be the 5th and 8th amendments. Double jeopardy... ...). The time the murderer stays in the cell is extreme isolation between sentencing and execution. The murderer stays in the cell for twenty-three hours (Wolf 47). That?s not enough time to breathe. The murderers are mistreated on the death row and that is why the death row should be abolished all together. The death penalty is racist, it punishes the poor, it causes the innocent to die, it is not a deterrent against violent crime, and it is cruel and unusual punishment. More than half of the countries in the world have already abolished the death penalty and the U.S should abolish it too. It is wrong and cruel. Some states in the U.S still hold the death penalty because they think it will keep U.S citizens safe, but we can just keep the murders in a separate patrolled jail. Abolish it and we may save the lives of the people that may have been executed innocent.

My Hero Is My Father Essay

Everyone has someone who has made an impact on his/her life. It can changed the view of this world. Sometimes people can get a hope from the person or the organization to change their life path. Since I have learned the differences between cons and pros, I found my self oriented to my father behavior. A father in love with his daughter. I love him even he is not alive any more. Although he passed away years ago, his advices and recommendations are still in my memory. He studied in a collage of oil and gas, and worked for the company in Iran named National Iranian Oil company. My brothers and I were proud of our parent. He was a strong family man who was devoted to providing the best he could for his family. I believe we were luckiest kids alive to have had two such loving parents. I firmly believe that my parents had impacts on shaping my future life. Especially my father effects on me most of the time when he were alive. body: Education My father always surrounded by books and newspapers that gave me a sense of reading. I grew up in this environment. When I was five years old, my father gave me a book as a gift on my birthday which have had big impact on me since I remember. One of the book that I love it is â€Å"The little prince† by Antoine de saint Exupery . My dad gave this to me when I left high school and whenever I see the cover I recall him. Reading a lot of different book helps improve my writing and my communication skills. I gain a lot of knowledge about the world around me by reading books. Behavior The lessons that my father taught me are very valuable for me. He always taught me to speak the truth, because it is the first step that will take me to success. He told me to be honest with everyone and every thing. This is the path of success in the future. Another value that he told me is to respect the elders and to love those who are younger. By respecting the elders, I will get prayers from them and by giving love to those who are younger, I will feel an internal peace. Personality My dad taught me help myself first try before I as for help. I am patient and determined, since I have tried hard to reach my goal and never complain. I have learned all these values from my father who devote his life to help me build up my personality. Being independent makes it easier to make decisions for me. I don’t rely on others Conclusion To me he is the greatest hero. Undoubtedly, parents play an important role in child’s development.

Janie and Jody, Conflict and Freedoom Their Eyes Were...

Janie and Jody, Conflict and Freedom: Their Eyes Were Watching God In the novel Their Eyes Were Watching God written by Zora Neale Hurston, the protagonist, Janie, and her husband for a respectable portion of her life, Jody Starks, seek courtship for entirely different reasons. Janie pursues sexual and emotional fulfillment as she journeys to the horizon and to a place of limitless possibility, while the male domineering Jody Starks seeks only after power, control, and a good place in society. These dramatic differences in ideals of love are the source of conflict between Janie and Jody and utterly shift Janie’s understanding of freedom and what it means to be free. Their different outlooks also lead to their downfall as a couple,†¦show more content†¦On the surface, it seems as though he is helping the fallen people of the town rise as a community, but just below the surface is the malicious aspiration to rise himself. Jody wants to rise to a position of authority so that he can demand things of others, just as he did in the establishment of the Eatonville. Furthermore, Jody’s controlling nature escalates to a point where Janie is affected. When Jody is named mayor of Eatonville, one of the men who helped build the store asks Janie to give a speech on behalf of her husband. Jody tells Janie that wives should not make speeches and prevents her making the speech. This scene marks Janie’s awareness of Jody’s desire to be in control, and it also marks the conflict between the two of them and what each of them wants out of the relationship. To allow Janie to speak would be to allow her to assert her identity in her own words. It would allow her to be heard and it would give her a sense of freedom. Jody cannot have this as it would interfere with his dominance. In order for Jody to assert his power, he must demean Janie. While Janie is not in agreement, in fact his opinion angers her; she remains silent in the hopes that she can still reach her horizon with him. Jody’s domineering nature continues to escalate and affect Janie and her dream of reaching â€Å"the horizon.† Jody purchases a street lamp for the town with his money and